Join us on Facebook! |
If
you were a fan of something and discovered that it was to be
continued by people with the level of talent that are involved here, then you'd think you'd be happy, wouldn't you? Of course you would.
But these 'fans' don't have brains in their heads, instead having to
filter their mindlessness through a tiny bigoted turd that connects
to their spinal column, which floats around in their thick, pre-evolved
skulls in a vacuum of fucking air. And as we've learnt from the
existence of the queef, it's the twats that have the most fucking air
in them that seem to make the loudest fucking noise. Because despite
how these raging tit-wits have spent the last few years by filling
the internet with their wank-spews of ignorance, it turns out that
they were completely fucking wrong. Feig's Ghostbusters has
opened to an overwhelming flood of positive reviews and with the
box-office healthy enough that a sequel will no doubt be on it's way.
Although, of course this hasn't stemmed the close-minded
arse-breathers from dragging themselves via the knuckles to their
keyboards in order to continue filling the void in their lives, with
this now provably unjustified hate.
Some
have claimed that the positive reviews that this movie is receiving
is due to the studio having paid the reviewers to say something nice.
Because I'm sure that such small publications as Time Magazine or The
Telegraph are more than prepared to risk their long term reputation
in exchange for some short-term pennies. If only the makers of The
Transformers franchise had cared
enough to pay the critics not to hate their horrible movies then
perhaps they'd have actually made some money back. Except they did
make money back, didn't they?! Because realistically the studios need
to pay off critics about as badly as the more well established and
widely read critics are likely to accept their offer, if it were ever
to come up. It's a bit like how the people sending death threats to
the crew of this movie are likely to ever achieve anything more
noteworthy than a 'who can fit the most sea-weed in their mouth
competition' as their fat, bloated corpses eventually wash up on a
deserted beach. I don't know about you, but it just doesn't seem
likely does it? The other claim that these skin-wasters have screamed
out of their rank, infected blow holes in reaction to the reviews is
to state that the only reason they're positive is because critics
would be considered sexist if they slagged off a movie featuring an
all-female cast. Firstly, that's not how 'sexism' works, is it?! And
secondly even if that was how 'sexism' worked, having read the
reviews for Spice World and
Sex And The City 2, I
don't think the critics would really give a shit... do you?!
As
a result of all of this unwarranted hate, I went into the new
Ghostbusters with the
sole intention of making it my new favourite film of all time. Every
lump of pre-judgemental and uninformed shit to be spewed out of
somebodies toothless lip-cracked mouth in regards to this movie
simply made me want to fucking like it out of sheer spite alone. I
was therefore a little disappointed to come out having seen it to
discover that in actual fact it was just alright. It was kind
of like marrying some guy to annoy those anti-gay marriage people and
then just as you get to the honeymoon suite you remember you're not
actually gay and now you've got to fuck him. However, with the lights
off, I guess it all feels the same, and as the cinema was plunged into
darkness and Ghostbusters began,
I'd be lying if I said I didn't enjoy what I experienced. It
was good. I think that I just had expectations that were a little too
high, and although I got a perfectly fine movie, I was hoping that this
Ghostbusters would be the
sole reason that we'd all evolved our eyes and those meaty flaps on
the side of our head that help the sound get into our skull.
In
an attempt to stab back at the prick-sticks that've spent a couple of
years shitting on the unreleased movie, I was hoping that Feig's film
would be an unbreakable diamond of a sword, when in reality it's
simply a perfectly workable machete of a movie. It's not the weapon I
was hoping for but it's still enough to beat the frozen splats of
stale jizzim that the other side have been using, like a thicker
version of those bone waving monkeys at the start of 2001:
A Space Odyssey. If I were to
compare this movie to another from this year I'd say that it's
probably on par with Goosebumps, however
the one advantage that Goosebumps has
over this is that it wasn't released with the same level of exception.
Because although this new film is absolutely fine and enjoyable, it
never quite gets away from the shadow of its more iconic and
influential original. Which isn't to say that I think the original is
perfect, by the way. I'd even argue that in terms of gauging
it's audience, the newer Ghostbusters has
a better grasp over its tone than the original, which mixed gags
aimed at children with a few rapey comments from Bill Murray, and a
scene in which Dan Aykroyd gets sucked off by a ghost.
I'd
even say that this new film is probably scarier than the original was,
and although not as funny, it's worth noting that the original was
hardly piss-your-pants hilarious. The original movie was fun and got
by on the charms of its cast, which is exactly the same with this
newer film here. It's just that as great as this cast is, they're not
quite yet as iconic as Murray and Aykroyd who are two decades ahead
of them in being able to collect fans and build a reputation. In the
same way that the women in this movie can't help the fact that
they're women, I don't think that we should punish them for not having
being born in the fucking 50's too. Plus, in terms of hoping this
movie would be hilarious, I wasn't comparing it the original, but
actually to Feig's previous film Spy which
really was laugh-out-loud brilliant. As much as I enjoyed Chris
Hemsworth's idiot secretary revealing the lack of lenses in his
glasses by subtly scratching his eyes through the frames, there really
is nothing here that compares to Jason Statham screaming about his
refusal to accept the non-existence of the 'fucking face-off
machine'.
It's
also worth noting that the effects in this new movie are also pretty
brilliant, with the ghosts being a brilliant blend of both CG and
practical work. The colours throughout the entire movie are also mind-blowingly beautiful and generally show the world to be as bright and
vivid as it usually looks right after I inhale and just before the
munchies kick in. Of course this contrasts slightly with the bland
and under-whelming villain, but as big a problem as that is, I suppose
it's nothing that isn't also true of the dweeb from Ghostbusters
2. Perhaps for me, the biggest
problem was simply that this film took place in a world that had
never experienced ghosts before, and as such is essentially an origin
story for the group. But in a world in which superhero movies are
holding onto cinema with the tightness of a wanking champions
unbreakable grip, I'm kind of sick of origin stories and would just
rather films cracked the fuck on. In which case, perhaps it would have
actually been a better idea to make this movie a proper Ghostbusters
3, with these new recruits having
to figure out what to do after years of a supernatural-free New York.
The original 'fans' would have been happier, and you could tell a
fairly similar story but that has slightly less edging and a little
more busting.
Although in quick defence of that, I would say that despite what the mouthy yogurt-slurpers have been screaming, this third film would never have happened. Not because of Paul Feig and his vision getting in its way, but because of Bill Murray and his reluctance to return to a franchise that he himself hates fifty-fucking-percent of. In which case, I think we need to go back to my original point that the new Ghostbusters is a good film and is the only version of this franchise that anybody was ever going to get. Therefore rather than being such a group of arse-stinking nimrods who gets their puss-bubbles in a boil simply because of their own weirdly out-of-whack priorities, perhaps we can just enjoy this movie for what it is. It's not hilarious, no, but that's not because it fails to be funny, but because it simply tries just to be fun. With that as a goal, I'd say that the movie is a success, and one that I did enjoy initially and suspect I'll enjoy more as the years go by and it's able to breathe without the pressure of expectation. Oh, and for the record, before the film was released, the comedian Patton Oswalt defended this movie and as a result found himself being tweeted by people accusing him of having murdered his recently deceased wife. If you're one of those people who did that over a fucking movie.. a movie that's turned out to be pretty fucking good... well, I honestly hope that you die a slow and painful death in which vein-poppingly huge tumours fill up every one of your blistering orifices and your body starts to collapse as it drowns in pools of it's own stinking bile. Cunts. Thanks for reading, motherfuckers, and see you next time.
Although in quick defence of that, I would say that despite what the mouthy yogurt-slurpers have been screaming, this third film would never have happened. Not because of Paul Feig and his vision getting in its way, but because of Bill Murray and his reluctance to return to a franchise that he himself hates fifty-fucking-percent of. In which case, I think we need to go back to my original point that the new Ghostbusters is a good film and is the only version of this franchise that anybody was ever going to get. Therefore rather than being such a group of arse-stinking nimrods who gets their puss-bubbles in a boil simply because of their own weirdly out-of-whack priorities, perhaps we can just enjoy this movie for what it is. It's not hilarious, no, but that's not because it fails to be funny, but because it simply tries just to be fun. With that as a goal, I'd say that the movie is a success, and one that I did enjoy initially and suspect I'll enjoy more as the years go by and it's able to breathe without the pressure of expectation. Oh, and for the record, before the film was released, the comedian Patton Oswalt defended this movie and as a result found himself being tweeted by people accusing him of having murdered his recently deceased wife. If you're one of those people who did that over a fucking movie.. a movie that's turned out to be pretty fucking good... well, I honestly hope that you die a slow and painful death in which vein-poppingly huge tumours fill up every one of your blistering orifices and your body starts to collapse as it drowns in pools of it's own stinking bile. Cunts. Thanks for reading, motherfuckers, and see you next time.
No comments :
Post a Comment