Join us on Facebook! |
T2: Trainspotting is
the suicidal, strap-on wearing, psychopathic, ex-smack head younger
brother to TV's Whatever Happened To The Likely Lads?
Two decades after stealing £16,000 from his mates, Renton returns
home to catch up with his past and for the first half hour I wasn't
sure what to think. The first film burst out of the gate like a
jockey chased by a race horse with both a bone-on and a lust
for life. T2 however is
a lot slower paced by comparison with the characters all ambling
aimlessly through existence like the newly buggered Jockey's limp to
the rubber ring shop. I suppose I really enjoyed the first half hour
regardless simply because it was nice to see where all of the
characters were up to. However it was at the thirty minute mark that
the film began to settle in my brain as I realised its new sense of
pace was shockingly enough a result of it being.. a different film.
Trainspotting was
about youthful nihilism, a bunch of wankers engaged in an existential
rebellion against the meaninglessness of life. T2:
Trainspotting however is about
what happens when you lose that fight and find yourself with fuck all
as a result, stuck between the melancholia of middle-age and the
misery of it. It's a film about decisions from the past resulting in
the fuck ups of today with only the pointlessness of tomorrow to look
forward to. Trainspotting is
about thinking everything is going to be shite whereas T2
is about finding out that you
were right.
Lately
there's been an increasing addiction within cinema to a concept known
as 'intertextuality' which is essentially an acknowledgement of a
relationship between two separate texts which will hopefully illicit
an inbuilt emotional response from the audience. For example in The
Force Awakens, the reveal of R2D2
is presented to us as a 'gasp moment' because we all know who the
character is from previous films and therefore have an attachment to
him. However in terms of the story and the other characters in the
scene, the reveal of R2 is about as emotional as watching a dog do a
piss up against a neighbour's bin. Essentially Hollywood has worked
out that it can wheel out nostalgia as its latest whore and the
public will pay through the nose to snort warm feelings and old
memories from the arse cheeks of cinema. The problem for T2:
Trainspotting is that if it
strays too far from the original there's a chance it won't feel like
a sequel, which is especially true considering how iconic every frame
of the original has become. However if it sticks too close to what
came before then it'll join the increasing rank of films that have
been criticised for being too referential or trapped within their own
legacy. It's like when my Granddad was dying and I'd visit him and
he'd either tell the same old story again for literally no reason or
he'd start waffling on about something new and I'd wonder what the
fuck he was talking about. I guess that's morphine for you.
The
genius of T2: Trainspotting is
that by being its own film about the misery of middle-age, it has to
deal with the legacy of the first film due to the characters defining
themselves and their relationships by their memory of the past. So in
Star Wars the reveal
of R2 is only significant to the audience, however in this film, any
sense of intertextuality works for both us and the characters. As
Spud spots the steps in which he was chased by the police twenty
years ago in the first film's opening scene, both he and us reflect on two
decades worth of bullshit. That stretch of road is iconic to us
because it opened one of the most important films of the 90's, whereas
it's even more important to him because that run resulted in him
going to prison and helped to fuck up his life. If you were to make
this film without having made the first then it would still require
the flashbacks to tell the story... which is to say that everything
you see here is completely self-contained as opposed to a simple
epilogue to what came before.. the brilliance of the movie is that we
are as invested in the characters' past and memories as they are.
Their reflection on time is a reflection of our own relationship with
it, and whether you're a smackhead or not, twenty years is rarely kind
to anybody. Twenty years ago I dreamt that one day I'd be allowed to
stay up late to eat cookies and watch a kung-fu movie whilst dressed
as Spider-Man. The other day I realised that's exactly what I was
doing. I'm 28 years old.. for fuck's sake!
None
of this is to say of course that the film is all doom and gloom, with
this sequel matching the original in terms of its grim-to-funny
ratio. Previously we had dead babies in the same film as a woman
freaking out that her boyfriend had accidentally returned their
home-made porno to the fucking video shop. Now we have attempted
suicides in the same film as a couple of chancers attempting to
improvise a song to a pub full of racists, with Jonny Lee Miller's
delivery of the word, “mm-no!” making me laugh more than anything
ever has ever. Does this film capture the zeitgeist of the moment in
the same way that the original did? Obviously it fucking doesn't.
Being able to make Trainspotting even once
is a miracle equal to the fact that Spud is still fucking alive. The
miracle of T2: Trainspotting is
that not only is it a great sequel, but it's a brilliant film in its
own right. In fact, ignoring any knowledge of it being sequel at all, it was simply nice to have one more film from the holy trinity of
British cinema with Danny Boyle, John Hodge, and Ewan McGregor back
together again.. and I say that as somebody who also loved their previous A
Life Less Ordinary. I know I'm
in the minority on that one but there was only a few people that used
to believe the world was round and so fuck you all.
I
said at the start of this that I can only imagine how disappointed I
would be if the film was crap which is a feeling that does now
thankfully require the use of imagination. It was about ninety
minutes into the movie that I let out a sigh of relief and realised
that I'd loved everything up until now and so even if they fucked up
the end I could still say that I at least liked the film. Then the final
twenty minutes played out, they didn't fuck it up, and I ended up
loving the film even more. Having learned more about the characters
histories, there's now even a chance that I'll end up seeing my
favourite film with slightly fresh eyes and loving it even more. Will
this sequel please everybody? Of course not. At a large enough circle
jerk, even one of those Indian Gods with a bunch of arms and a trunk
would fail to satisfy everybody. However for those that find
themselves touched by it, I can promise something special... from the film I mean. Previously
we were played out by Born Slippy which is now the closest thing you
can get to a time machine with one note of it transporting you back
to the 90's without the need of a shit car going 88 miles per hour. This
time however we get Wolf Alice's Silk.. and, for me personally, I can't
think of a better way to end T2: Trainspotting than
hearing that I'm “looking for protector, God never reached out in
time, There's love, there is a saviour, but that ain't no love of
mine”. Why spend forever dwelling on the past? Choose your future, choose life, choose to love T2: Trainspotting, and choose to end this blog in the most obvious way. Thanks for reading, motherfuckers, and see you next time.
No comments :
Post a Comment