Being the miserable cunt that I am, I'm
obviously not a fan of special occasions. I could rant all day about my hatred
of jolly, merry Shitmas but the rest are just as bad. All of the other yearly
occasions were simply invented to make insecure people feel loved at the
benefit of card companies. I hate to sound like a twat but if I have to pick a
side, I'd rather be labelled as a 'cynic' than be a dead-eyed member of team
gullible. Despite all that however, there is one thing that I look forward to
more than anything else and that's the release of a new James Bond film. If
commercialised affection isn't for me then you can damn well bet that watching
a misogynist shooting a Russian in the face is. I think that everybody should
also agree that after fifty years and twenty-three official films, the latest
adventure to feature one of Britain's finest contributions to pop-culture
really is something that should be celebrated. Given a choice between a
birthday or 007's latest premier, I honestly prefer the one that doesn't
make me feel a year closer to fucking death.
Because of this, Skyfall has a lot
of expectation to live up to. Not only has it got several generations of film
lovers eager to see it but it's been four years since the release of Quantum
of Solace. I'm a punctual chap in general who treats lateness with such a
level of fascism that for every minute waiting for someone who is late, I spend
it planning the next holocaust. Considering that Bond has had me waiting for
approximately one thousand, four hundred and fifty days, that suave cunt had
better have a fucking good excuse. As it turns out, he bloody well does.
Skyfall begins
with Bond trying to salvage a mission gone wrong. Somebody has stolen a
hard-drive which contains a list of all known working field agents and M wants
it back. Bond therefore gives chase in an attempt to prevent this sensitive
information from being released. To be honest, the only thing on my hard-drive
is hardcore pornography so I can empathise with MI6 here. God knows what I'd do
if my computer was stolen because I'm seriously prepared to kill if anyone even
glances towards my browsing history.
After a destructive motorbike chase, Bond
quickly finds himself fighting the thief on the top of a moving train as a
fellow agent tries to snipe the assailant from afar. Under M's orders, Bond’s
colleague takes a shot, misses the target and accidentally hits him. When I
worked as a wedding videographer, the only way I could fuck my job up as much
as this would have been if I was caught shaft deep inbetween the bride’s tits.
The rest of the film is therefore M's attempt to repair the reputation of MI6,
correct the mistake of shooting Bond and avoid the threat of a forced
retirement. I don't want to call M incompetent but with Ralph Fiennes walking
around, she also seems to have missed the fact that her department has been
successfully infiltrated by Lord Voldemort using only a prosthetic nose as a
disguise. What a stupid, useless bitch!
Considering that most people would feel
short-changed if this was the end, I think it's obvious that 007 doesn't die in
the first five minutes. Instead he decides to take a little time out to
recuperate on a relaxing sandy beach. We rarely see Bond on holiday so it's
interesting to watch what he gets up to. As it turns out he enjoys getting
wankered, pissing about with scorpions and fucking people. I'm not a travel
agent but I think that's called the 'Charlie Sheen Package'.
After an attack on MI6 headquarters, Bond
decides to return to work. The stolen hard-drive from the beginning has come
back to haunt them and the culprit appears to have some personal vendetta
against M. It's not revealed why yet but I suspect it's probably that he saw
the Judi Dench fingering scene in Notes on a Scandal. Unfortunately for
her, 007 is now out of shape and needs retraining. Since being shot a couple of
times, he can now only run several miles, do a few hundred sit ups and really
struggles at a few measly pull ups. What a lazy, fat bastard he is!
In the twenty-three films released so far,
it seems that there are two kinds of Bond film. There's the slightly more
grounded ones like Live and Let Die and then there are the bat-shit
crazy ones like Moonraker. I know every Bond film is technically a
fantasy but there are obviously various degrees of it. 007 verses the drugs
trade is quite grounded whereas Roger Moore riding a hover gondola past the
double-take pigeon isn't. On a scale of zero-to-'what the fuck', I'd say that
interestingly Skyfall is heading back into the more fantastical kind of
Bond film. Personally I don't have a problem with this so long as they stay in
control by continuing to hire respectable directors. Sam Mendes proved his
credibility when he won an Oscar for American Beauty, a film which
brilliantly depicted a man having a midlife crisis. Lee Tamahori helmed Die
Another Day and has since been arrested for dressing up as a woman and
trying to charge random men for a shag. No prizes for guessing which of those
two had the better insight into the mind of James Bond.
One of the more fantastical elements of Skyfall
is of course the crazed villain Raoul Silva. Played by Javier Bardem, he's a
bit like a cross between Hannibal Lecter, The Joker and Quentin Crisp. I won't
reveal too much about him except to say he's brilliant and proper full-on gay.
As far as I know, there hasn't been a male villain who threatens Bond with sex
since Grace Jones fucked him in A View to a Kill. Each Bond villain in
the Daniel Craig films has had a disability and Skyfall is no exception.
Again, I won't reveal it, except to say it's worse than Le Chiffre's bleeding
eye but not as awful as Dominic Greene being French.
The other thing that I really loved about Skyfall
was just how much of it was set in Britain. There's always been an odd
relationship between Bond and Batman and there's no denying that this film
borrows from The Dark Knight. The shots of Bond surveying London from
the rooftops are iconically similar to Batman guarding his city of Gotham and
there's a downbeat tone suggesting that not everyone will survive. Bond’s dead
parents also get highlighted and used as the motivation for his life a little
like Batman's always were. I think it's strange that being an orphan would make
Bond want to become a spy as both my parents are alive and nothing could drive
me to kill more than them. None of these comparisons are a criticism either by
the way, as Nolan has made a career out of pilfering from 007 in the first
place. To be honest I think if that fucker tries to take anything else from
Bond he should be punished and forced to direct the next film in the franchise.
That'd teach the talented little shit a lesson!
It was always obvious that Mendes would be
able to handle the drama of a Bond film but the question was ‘could he do the
action too?’ So far the closest thing he's done to this is Jarhead which
follows a gulf war soldier who, in an act of pure visual cinema, didn't kill a
single bloody person. I hate to reveal my own mental issues but if Bond hasn't
fucked and killed some dumb broad within the first hour then I'm really not
happy. It's not that I'm a sexist, it's just that he is and I'm a little afraid
of any change whatsoever. Luckily however, Mendes knows this and so deals with
the death and destruction in a suitably nonchalant way. At one point there's a
game of 'shoot the bottle off a girls head' followed by a brilliant, cold-hearted
and fucked up quip from Bond. To be honest I'm glad the quips are making a
return as from 007's previous one liners, it's obvious that like Fatty Arbuckle,
he's always going to be known for being more of a killer than a comedian.
However nothing beats a man with a prosthetic hand struggling to remove a watch
before Roger Moore angrily calls him a “Butterhook”.
The other great thing that Mendes did was
bring over his regular cinematographer Roger Deakins. For anyone that doesn't
know, a cinematographer is simply the guy who hangs the lights up and makes a
film look all pretty and shit. In terms of the people doing that job, Deakins
is one of the best and a genuine genius. Being a reserved and gentle Brit, he's
also one of the better DoP's that's not stupid enough to slag off The
Avengers and piss off the fanboys. His inclusion on Skyfall is
an act of sheer brilliance with this clearly now being the most visually
impressive Bond film ever. Thinking about it, I'd probably say that the
Shanghai sequence was so beautiful that with it's neon lighting I swear they
must have invented some brand new colours for us.
There's also a shadowy noir feel to Skyfall
that creates a blanket of mood so heavy it could almost smother Bond himself.
In fact, the end of the movie looks so gloomy and haunted that it almost
becomes the Bond equivalent of Straw Dogs. Just for clarification though,
I mean that in terms of style and tone and not the occurrence of a randomly
indulgent rape scene. It took us long enough to accept a blonde Bond so I think
it'll be a few more years before we allow him to become a full blown sex
offender. Whether he gets consent or not however, I do think it's about time Q
branch started supplying him with standard issue condoms. If they designed some
of those novelty luminous ones, Deakins could probably control that too and
make a sex scene look like some sort of fucking poetic lightsaber fight.
If I have a criticism with Sam Mendes's
usual team here, then it would probably be with the hiring of composer Thomas
Newman. It's not that the music wasn't good but rather it was possibly too
obviously his own. Half the film sounded like American Beauty and then
every so often the Bond theme would unsubtly kick in. There was scenes in which
Bond was talking to Silva and it genuinely felt like Chris Cooper was going to
walk in and shoot them because of his own repressed homosexuality. Having said
that though and because I'm really, really cool, I've just spent the last few
hours repeatedly listening to the score and it does sound great. Maybe it just
felt a little jarring at first because I'm used to the sound of regular Bond
composer David Arnold being here. Like I said before, I'm not a fan of change
so maybe this will be a grower. I know that the film isn't perfect but I'm
genuinely struggling to find anything negative I want to say about it and that
was the closest I could think of…
Daniel Craig's ears looked particularly
massive but that's not really a fault of the film. If anything they'd probably
even help Bond as a spy by acting as a pair of huge, meaty satellites. In fact
you know what? Fuck it. The film is genuinely fucking brilliant and probably
the best thing I've seen this year. I've been a huge fan of the franchise ever
since I was old enough to support the weight of my own head and so this film
was as enjoyable and appealing to me as pregnancy is to underage trailer-trash.
It's nice to see too, that Craig is settling into the role with the kind of
comfort that's going to ensure that every one of his successors will be one day
compared to him. Judi Dench was also so stupidly good in this that she's
officially become the first and best Bond Woman. She plays the vulnerable but
confident surrogate Mum to both Bond and Silva with the two brothers fighting
to protect and kill her. It's nice to know that the plot of Skyfall is
kept very British and is clearly an adaptation of The Jeremy Kyle Show.
In a way, Skyfall almost feels like
it could, in an alternate world, be the reboot film that Casino Royale turned
out to be. Its basic theme seems to be looking at how relevant Bond is
in this modern world and then asking if we could get by without him. In fact
that the whole set up can be summed up by Bond and M's first exchange in Goldeneye.
She accuses him of being a, “Sexist, misogynist, Dinosaur. A relic of the Cold
War!” before admitting that, “If you think for one moment
I don't have the balls to send a man out to die, your instincts are dead
wrong”. To her cold hearted credit she at least can't be accused of being two
faced!
Skyfall spends
its duration subtly and lovingly hinting towards 007's past films and upbringing
and then like a twat, rather bluntly burns it all to the ground. By the end of
this film, Bond is as complete, fresh and attachment free as Sean Connery's was
at the start of Dr No. As far as last scenes go, Skyfall's is
almost fifty years in the making and has created a level of excitement not felt
since Batman Begins revealed the Joker card. The franchise has being
going for half a century and the line; “He'll see you now” has ensured a
freshness of direction that makes the sequel just too exciting to think about.
Is Bond still relevant? Relevant's got nothing to do with it. Bond has an
unexplainable and ingrained sense of loyalty to his country and so do we, to
him. It's a similar relationship that fatties share with cake and lard.
For as long as they make films, Bond will
be around with each new adventure being treated with the excitement and sense
of occasion that they genuinely deserve. Perhaps the character has been a
little lost since the Cold War ended, but finally with Skyfall he knows
where he is and has found his place in our world. That's definitely more than
can be said of hairy man-tit David Hasselhoff and he's still got a career. Five
decades since the first film and I'm already looking forward to being in the
queue for Bond 24. If there's two things us Brits love, it's a Bond
movie and a good queue. Throw in a cup of tea and some repressed sexual urges
and you've got yourself a perfect Saturday night. Is Skyfall the best
Bond? Maybe- I'm just glad that we've now got twenty-three to choose from and
there's a chance that it could be.
Follow this blog or I'll fucking cut you.
Hay did you like how he said For our eyes only to the guy with the metal pieces? I thought that was eally good, like the film For Your Eyes Only. There was a few like that.
ReplyDeleteIndeed. Although I think my favourite was the moment he jumped on the Komodo Dragons. I'm presuming that was a little reference to the crocodiles in Live and Let Die. So I take it you enjoyed the film?
ReplyDeleteI'm new here, but great review! I'm going to start following this blog, just because of this single review (I have to admit i didn't read the others yet though). Talking about references, Bond's home as a kid is located in Scotland in the movie, which is Sean Connery's place of birth. I guess you already knew, but I thought it was very nice to remind everyone of Bond's roots (the franchise, not the character).
ReplyDeleteThanks, I hope you enjoy the rest of it too!
DeleteRegarding Bond having a Scottish home that's actually in the books. Apparently Ian Fleming added that detail in after seeing Sean Connery's performance. That's what I read anyway.
Good Critique on the New Bond Film. Need to see it! ...
ReplyDelete... Sounds like it doesn't disappoint either.
Craig is very good. I was glad he came out punching and silenced
the critics right off the bat on "Casino Royale" when they had written
him off before a frame of the film had even been shot!
If I was going to be critical at all, and this is only
a subtle thing ... I'd say that if anything* - [*And this is mainly
in comparison with Connery.] - He is a little "Stiff" physically.
Connery, to me, moved a lot better. He seemed more relaxed and at ease with himself.
That may, mind you, have a little bit to do with the fact that physically,
Sean was naturally a bigger man than Daniel, who has had to bulk up
a little for the role. And training with weights can make your movement a little bit less fluid.
... It's a very subtle thing, but noticeable.
All that said however, Daniel Craig is an absolutely brilliant Bond, and even as
a Connery fan, I think DC is, at the very least, now seriously tugging hard on
Sean C's Tux for The Title of "Best Bond Ever"!
Yesshhh ... I Think Thatsh It For Nowoo ... ?:-)
Have A Good Day.
What a brilliant comment! ^
DeleteToo much swearing ruined your narrative and I lost interest halfway through. Don't get me wrong, 'cunt' is my favourite word, and I endeavour to use it as much as possible, but it only works when written if it is used in conjunction with humour and, or, extreme rage/anger; neither of which were frequented much here. Interesting points raised but gratuitous swearing for swearing's sake becomes redundant very quickly and dilutes what I initially was quite enamoured to read.
DeleteFound your blog through IMDB and your comments on a particular thread were much more lucid and insightful. So, as a general tip, lose the swearing. It's not big or clever, unless you do it properly.
Don't mean to sound so critical, I'm not exactly a novelist, but I literally could not finish reading this article.
Read Arseblog.com for a general tip on how to lace good humour/wordplay with offensive language - the guy is a literary genius.
Genius blog, as per usual!! I do like te thoughts on how muc of the film was set in Britain. As the weeks have passed by since watching the film, that sense of Britishness was one of the main things about the film that stood out. I don't just mean because Bond is British, but I think there is a feeling of redefing not just Bond's place in the world but also Britains. It's really taking the hero back to his home town and re-examining not just what he is and has become, but what's become of the world he is supposed to represent.
ReplyDeleteAll in all a great film and though I still say maybe I wouldn't have had moneypenny as a former field agent I can see how i works.
Plus, the more of Fleming's books I read the more I realising and reading on the internet of a more complex relationship between the two.
For example though the books differ at times, I would say the darker more personality based Bond of Daniel Craig is most like Ian Fleming's one. And influence went both ways, though he didn't live t0 see many of the films apparently he saw Dr No and was a big fan of Sean Connery's Bond. It was only in a book that came out after the film that Fleming then referenced Bond's Scotish ancestry and the back story about his parent's death...
So to sum up, let Moneypenny be a former field agent, let her be a former bricky bricky or a bus driver, Bonds both a literary and a flm franchise is all about reinvention and new chapter's and Skyfall was bloody briliant.