Join us on Facebook! |
Cut
to forty-nine years later and we're now given the live action remake
of one of Disney's greatest achievements. His absolute greatest
achievement of course being the time he got somebody to chop his dead
head off and pop it in the fridge without taking a selfie next to it.
This 2016 version of The Jungle Book has
essentially the exact same plot as the original but with a few tweaks
here and there. The ending is a bit more Die Hard than
the cartoon was, and a few songs have been cut out, such as that one by
those vultures that sounded suspiciously like a particularly well
known band of scousers. I guess it's just that bit harder for the
filmmakers to find a band that rips off The Beatles now that Oasis
have split up. However the rest of the characters are phenomenal,
having been better cast than one of those £200 dildos that are
based on somebodies actual cock. I mean, despite being from fucking
Scarborough, Ben Kingsley seems to be able to play every nationality
under the sun and so moving into the animal kingdom to play a
panther feels like a natural progression, really. Plus other than all
of those fat men that linger for a little too long in my gym's
changing room, I can't think of anybody better than Bill Murray to
play a big old hairy bear.
However
the bulk of the cast are really just doing voice overs I suppose, with
the only real human-being being the kid that plays Mowgli. In fact, he's
pretty much the only real thing in the whole movie, with the term
'live action' being about as misleading as the average profile
picture on Tinder. Virtually every single thing on screen has been
computer generated which is fucking insane considering how completely
photo-real everything looks. A friend and I once overheard a fat man
with tattoos down his face asking his partner “Why are there no
good pictures of me?” To which my friend instantly responded with,
“Because the camera never lies”. Well, if this film is anything to
go by then the camera is now as full of shit as your average
politician having had their arse sewn shut and been force fed manure.
You could obviously argue how pointless it is to spend hours creating
a leaf out of pixels when you could just nip outside and grab one of
the free ones off a tree. However the Jungle is presented here as a
child might see it, with everything being given an extra glow of
mysteriousness and a shimmering dreamlike quality. I suppose this
reinforces my argument that everything is actually happening in a
little crazy boys' fucked up head. Oh and the size of the environment
has also been exaggerated to add to this effect. Although I suppose
if me and my twelve inch cock are anything to go by then exaggerating
something's size can be true of adults too.
The
only possible downside to having everything created in a computer is
that the kid playing Mowgli isn't the greatest actor in the world. I
mean, don't get me wrong.. he's not bad. Obviously there's
enough pressure on child actors as there is but in a year in which
we've also seen that other kid in Room, I
think this little fucker needs to up his game. He's completely
likeable and has both the physicality and perfect balance of
confidence and naivety about him. It's just that occasionally he
confuses expressing emotion with simply shouting, and to quote a
phrase that my old boss once used, some of his line deliveries are
“flatter than a pencil sketch of Keira Knightley's tits”. Luckily
everything else around him is at its most impressive and so more than
makes up for his shortest of short-comings. Do I believe that he
feels fear or anger towards the tiger? Not all the time, no. But do I
feel those things towards it myself? Yes. Shere Khan is one of the
film's most brilliant creations and is as terrifying to watch as you'd
imagine a photo-real tiger to be as it threatens the life of a small
human boy. Although it probably helps with the tension if you've seen that YouTube video of the mental bloke who jumped into the tigers cage at
the zoo before being dragged off by his fucking head.
Shere
Khan might be a mad bastard but considering his hatred is directed
towards the species that has driven his own so close to extinction, I actually found him quite sympathetic. I once found myself in a
murderous rage just because somebody ate a sausage that I'd been
saving and so I can only imagine how mad I'd be if some stupid
fuck-nugget wanted to eat my bones to cure their insomnia. Here's a
quick tip to anybody who does think that snorting ground up tigers
will help you with your sleep.. it won't. But sucking on the naughty
end of a shotgun might fucking help. With Idris Elba voicing him, it's
also nice to see a black guy getting some work in The Jungle Book.
In the original cartoon version,
it was meant to be Louis Armstrong playing King Louie before Disney
made some strange assumptions and cast Louis Prima instead. They
decided it'd be safer to hire a white guy over a black one in case
people saw it as a racist thing that Armstrong was voicing a monkey.
I mean, firstly, I don't think anybody would ever have made that
connection anyway, and secondly, I like that they thought it'd be less
racist to simply do a black guy out of a job.
Either
way though, I'm sure we can all agree that both Prima and Armstrong
are significantly better singers than Christopher Walken is here as
he performs “I wanna be like you” in the style of a dyslexic
mobster. Not that this is a criticism by the way, with the songs being
integrated perfectly within this movie. Walken obviously can't sing
as well as an iconic singer from the days of yesteryear and so it
makes sense for him to simply play to his own strengths by doing the
song as though its finale will involve him shooting Dennis Hopper in
his cantaloupe of a head. The same is also true of 'The Bare
Necessities' which is belted out by Murray in exactly the same way
that he drunkenly performs karaoke when crashing strangers parties. I
also think it's a huge complement to the film that despite how iconic
both Baloo and Murray are, I wasn't wondering when they'd turn up.
The story is so strong and the effects so over-whelming that I found
myself completely immersed in that world on screen. This is
particularly impressive when considering that it's directed by Jon
Favreau whose consistency as a director seems to fluctuate as
frequently as his ever changing waist line.
Is
this 2016 version of The Jungle Book better
than the cartoon from 1967? Well.. obviously not. But considering
that the original has had almost half a century to fester in our
minds, it highlights the brilliance of this movie that it's able
to stand on it's own regardless. Obviously the genesis of the entire
thing is from the stories by Rudyard Kipling which are rife with subtext
and morals. I'm not sure that's true of this iteration, which doesn't
even bother to answer the ancient question about whether or not a bear shits
in the woods. But if ever you find yourself in the mood for a film
that mixes action and fantasy with a photo-real tiger and you can't
find your DVD of Life Of Pi then
this is the film to reach for. Favreau initially made a name for
himself with the early 90's indie comedy Swingers and
so it's amazing to see him at a point in his career in which he's now
working with the most cutting edge of technology. Not only has it
produced a great film but it's also allowed every blog and critic on
the movie to end their piece with the shite joke that “He's now the
King of the Swingers too”. Thanks for reading, motherfuckers, and see
you next time.
No comments :
Post a Comment