Join us on Facebook! |
The
film begins thirty years after the original in which new Blade
Runner 'K', played by Ryan Gosling, uncovers a mystery after an
encounter with a replicant. And that's all you need to know because
one of the many joys of the film is in how it never gives you quite
what you'd expect from a sci-fi blockbuster that cost more than $150
million to make. I also say 'one of the many joys' because like both
its predecessor and the dick that every guy claims to have, Blade
Runner 2049 is both a grower and
a shower. A grower because the movie is so ram-packed with ideas that
you won't really be able to take them all in until you leave the
movie and start to digest them. As with the first film, this one
deals with what it means to be human, the importance of memories, and
that small matter of the meaning of life. Although unlike the
original film's antagonist Roy Batty, K isn't so much after more life
as he is a simple purpose in one. On top of all of this, Blade
Runner 2049 also touches upon
racism, with the replicants being treated as second class citizens
because fuck it.. people, like some prick of a seagull at the beach,
can only feel good about themselves when they're finding new ways to
shit on top of somebody else's head.
The
aspect that I found most poignant however was the idea that rather
than being the centre of the universe, we're all just cogs in a
machine. And it's not even that good of a machine. Being a cog in one
of those giant Pacific Rim robot things might at least give
you some bragging rights but really we're all just batteries being
used to power the dildo of existence as it fucks us into the grave.
Without going into Tyler Durden's 'slaves in white collars' speech,
Blade Runner 2049 explores the realisation that we're not the
main character in the story of life but rather we're just an extra
that's finally realising that the best it can ever hope for is a line
of dialogue. The source novel asks, 'do androids dream of electric
sheep?' with this film proposing that on top of our own despair we
also inherit the dreams and anxieties of our creators. Or as Philip
Larkin once wrote, “Man hands on misery to man, it deepens
like a coastal shelf. Get out as early as you can, And don't have any
kids yourself”. So essentially yes. Androids probably do dream of
electric sheep.. but only if they were created in a factory in Wales
in which that is pretty much every working man's greatest sexual
fantasy. Although I should say that the film is better than I've just
made it sound. It's like all of that that but without my 'pretentious
sixth former' musings on existentialism and my unhealthy obsession
with dick references.
And
speaking of dicks to go back to my original point of growing and
showing... the film is therefore also a shower because on top of the
exploration of character, their missions, and their need for a
philosophy, Blade Runner 2049 looks fucking amazing. A big
deal is being made about the work of cinematographer Roger Deakins
here and rightly so because if you paused the movie at any point then
you'd be presented with a frame of such beauty that my own bio-pic
could start with a close-up of my eye as I stare in awe of it. If
you're still yet to watch this film then trust me, “I've seen
things you people wouldn't believe”. This is clearly set in the
same world as the first film however rather than simply replicating
it and becoming a pale imitation like the live action Ghost In The
Shell, Villeneuve has imagined how things may have evolved over
the last thirty years. In some cases this even includes seeing snow
which is presumably a hint towards his own Canadian heritage. I
didn't spot it but there must be a semi-destroyed and neon sign for a
Tim fucking Hortons in there somewhere. As much as this is a sequel
to Blade Runner it also feels like a natural continuation of
the work Villeneuve was doing on Incendies, Enemy, and
Arrival. To say that Villeneuve is one of the most exciting
directors of our time would be pure hyperbole. But this is a blog and
hyperbole is our main source of currency.. so fuck it... There is
nobody better than Villeneuve right now with his cinematic streak
currently being hotter than the devils arse-hole after shitting out a
curry that he ate on the fucking Sun.
Of
course Blade Runner 2049 isn't entirely perfect but what the
fuck is? There's a scene in which K briefly chats to the original
films Gaff which is the only minute of the film that goes nowhere and
feels like it exists only for fan service. When Gaff says, “you
could see it in his eyes”, he may as well turn to camera and give a
big smile and a thumbs up. Also despite the way everything else is
suggested with subtlety and nuance our introduction to Jared Leto's
character is a scene in which he monologues his motives like a cross
between a Bond villain and Basil Exposition. In any other film this
would not only be fine but it'd be the norm. In a film as
extraordinary as this one though it literally stands out like a fart
in an elevator. And speaking of Leto, his character was originally
envisioned as being a part for David Bowie to play which makes sense
considering how androgynous this film depicts the future as being.
Robin Wright's character literally looks like a slimmer Dolph
Lundgren with most children having had their heads shaved and wearing
clothes that literally make them indistinguishable from one another.
However even despite this the film seems a little obsessed with the
idea of woman as sexual objects. Yes it has some really strong female
characters such as Robin Wrights or Sylvia Hoeks's however that
doesn't distract from the fact that all the prostitutes and adverts
for porn seem to feature exclusively women. Which makes this one of the few films
in which I guess my main criticism is in a world of androgyny...
where are all the naked men?
There
is actually an interesting gender thing going on in the background of
this movie too which I can't go into because of spoilers. But the
film seems to be entering a scenario in which women are being written
out of humanity which would explain why in this world we only ever
see that gender as the one to be objectified. Regardless of this
though it's not actually something that the film really deals with,
with its focus being more on the existence of a soul in favour of
the role of women within society. For example if you look at K's
hologram girlfriend Joi as played brilliantly by Ana De Armas then
she really does only seem to exist to serve the emotions of K within
both the workings of the film and the world of the story. She's his unquestioning Pinocchio-like
girlfriend whose only goal in life is to be real for him whilst in
terms of narrative she only really exists to show the emotional
roller-coaster that he's going on. Of course their entire
relationship also works towards the films questions of what it is
that makes us real however the existentialism of the scenario is what
takes priority over the role of gender. Perhaps this could be a
natural area to explore further if somebody ever attempts a third
Blade Runner film? Although I have no idea which filmmaker
would have the balls to follow these two movies with another one
considering quite how breathtaking they are. In fact I'd worry that
they're so good that it'd actually have to be a very stupid director that would think they could. Somebody
distract Brett fucking Ratner right fucking now.
No comments :
Post a Comment