Join us on Facebook! |
According
to Professor Google, cognitive dissonance is defined as “the state
of having inconsistent thoughts, beliefs, or attitudes, especially as
relating to behavioural decisions and attitude change”. To apply
this to the film as though I know what the fuck I'm talking about,
then the character of Deadpool would represent the thoughts, beliefs,
or attitudes, with the film's plot representing the contradicting
behavioural decisions and attitude change. So on the surface, Deadpool
might give across an anarchic vibe that suggests he's there to shake
up the system, however the film itself is as guilty as being cliched
as my ex is of being a fucking mental. To give an example, the film
is aware that having a bland British villain with a cheesy name has
been done more times than Annabel Chong at a gang bang. However
rather that subverting this cliché in any interesting way, it simply
points it out whilst completely conforming to it. It's kind of like
trying to cure cancer by simply stating that you're dying of cancer.
Or to say that more simply.. it's like a dead Jehovah's Witness. The
film doesn't take the concept to any comedic extremes or attempt to
re-invent it in anyway.. its sole attempt to take the piss out of
the concept of boring villains is by simply telling you that that's
exactly what it has. Not to go on about her, but it really is the
equivalent of hearing the muffled voice of my ex as she'd moan about
her weight whilst licking the dregs from the bottom of her KFC
breakfast-bucket.
Of
course however I suppose the counter argument to this could be that
the character of Deadpool needs to exist within a cliched story in
order for him to stand out as different. Perhaps such a
perversive persona wouldn't seem so extreme if they were in a less
sedate environment? Well, in response to that, I suppose I'd have to
present both Nicolas Cage's post-stroke Adam West-like performance as
Big Daddy in Kick-Ass; and
Hit-Girl, his cute little daughter with the soul of Joe fucking
Pesci. The only thing that Deadpool does that they don't is break the
fourth wall, however at least they're actually managing to be sweary,
violent, and enjoyably meta in a film that still manages to deviate
from formulaic predictability. When compared to Kick-Ass's
independent, punk rock
aesthetics, Deadpool is
essentially the Sex Pistols.. A
manufactured band that acted as though they were against the system
despite having been exclusively created by Malcolm McLaren
to help sell his fashion line.
Which isn't to say of course that neither Deadpool or
The Sex Pistols as
individuals are completely unauthentic or lacking the strength of
their rebellious convictions. Deadpool's
justifiably biggest selling point is the brilliantly played and
faithfully realised zaniness of its main character, and who can forget
that time that Sid Vicious distanced himself from the hypocrisy of
the Sex Pistols by
dying of a heroin over-dose after stabbing his girlfriend to fucking
death.
So
yeah, as a film, Deadpool doesn't
do much beyond point out its own faults and fail to highlight a few
others. It might have acknowledged the watery-shit blandness of its
villain, but I don't think it expressed any self-awareness in regards
to Morena Baccarin's 'tart with a heart'. In honesty, I've also heard
people complain about the shite performance given by the character of
Colossus. However I didn't actually think it was that bad beyond
secretly lamenting the fact that they didn't just cast The Rock and
wrap him in tin-foil. Oh, and nor did the film seem to be particularly
aware of its lead characters slightly confusing motive. He wants
revenge on a man that cured him of a terminal illness and made him an
immortal.. because it came at the expense of his looks? I wonder if an
actual cancer sufferer or somebody as ugly as either the fucking
Elephant Man or worse, Mickey Rourke, might view this sympathetically?
I obviously understand that Deadpool is meant to be a prick, it's just
that this wasn't used to define his character as much as it just felt
like a plot hole. Not that the film doesn't love it's holes, with a
substantial amount of its attention being placed on Deadpool's anus.
But
as much as Deadpool might be an arse-hole that's constantly showing
us his arse-hole, he is completely the reason that this movie is as
enjoyable as it is. Although the film mostly fails to stick two
fingers up at convention, that doesn't mean that it isn't still fun,
and that's mostly thanks to Ryan Reynold's enthusiastic performance.
Having previously played a bastardised version of the
character in the shite-as-shite X-Men Origins: Wolverine, Reynold's
seems to have spent the subsequent seven years in some sort of
meditative state of zen-like preparation. Like Batman going into the
mountains to piss about with Liam Neeson and his little blue flowers,
Reynold's has returned to the role with such focus that you'd assume
this was something that he was born to do. Admittedly his quips are
closer to dick-jokes than actual Oscar Wilde-style wit, but he
delivers each one perfectly and although they might not all hit, they
come so frequently that, like the shit on the proverbial wall, there's
enough flying for enough to stick.
Reynolds
also gets the movement of the character spot-on, with it simply being
a shame that the whole film couldn't have the same stylistic
zippiness and kinetic energy that he manages when performing
slap-stick or fighting. Visually, the thing is about as
experimental as a couple of monks on National Fuck-A-Friend Day, with
the opening credits listing the director as “some over-paid
ass-hole”. Although I wouldn't go that far, I do agree that the
writers are also the “real heroes”. The fact that the film is
being funded by a money obsessed studio might be the reason that
Deadpool wasn't able to
tea-bag the entire genre. However if you take this as just another
superhero film then they did manage to come up with a refreshing way
to structure an origin story in a way that didn't require an
action/suit-less opening first act.
The film critic Mark Kermode gave this film a positive review, but mentioned that it was “a corporate version of anarchy”. This sentiment was echoed in a review by The Shiznit in which the film was compared to an edgy comedian being forced to make money at a corporate gig. Well, I obviously agree with both, having started all of this off with an indulgent and likely misogynistic metaphor regarding my ex and the film trying to have the best of all worlds. Deadpool is absolutely in no way perfect, however although it might have tried to have its cake and eat it... like my stupid ex's lady parts, that cake was still well worth eating at the time. Thanks for reading, motherfuckers, and see you next time.
The film critic Mark Kermode gave this film a positive review, but mentioned that it was “a corporate version of anarchy”. This sentiment was echoed in a review by The Shiznit in which the film was compared to an edgy comedian being forced to make money at a corporate gig. Well, I obviously agree with both, having started all of this off with an indulgent and likely misogynistic metaphor regarding my ex and the film trying to have the best of all worlds. Deadpool is absolutely in no way perfect, however although it might have tried to have its cake and eat it... like my stupid ex's lady parts, that cake was still well worth eating at the time. Thanks for reading, motherfuckers, and see you next time.
No comments :
Post a Comment