Join us on Facebook! |
Right
now we seem to be having a bit of a moment in the real world as we've
just discovered that people can be pricks and we're not quite sure
what to do about it. Louis CK likes forcing people to watch him wank
off, which is gross enough to just have to imagine let alone see. The
less said about John Travolta opening up his anus for a massage the
better too because I don't want to help bulemic people by giving them
something to think about. The thing about Louis CK for example though
is that he'd always seemed so funny and left wing and pro women's
rights. Does this mean that we can no longer enjoy his previous stand-up?
Obviously there's an argument to be made against financially
supporting people like him through his work, but just in terms of the
work itself? It seems confusing because we always like to put people
into boxes and the idea that a 'baddie' could also do something good
or contradictory doesn't quite fit with the simplicity of that. How
is it possible that a man that forces people to look at his
shrivelled, ginger, pig dick, could generate huge amount of love from
his seemingly insightful and hilarious views on our collective human nature? Well, as
The Three Billboards Outside Ebbing, Missouri seems
to suggest.. people are actually three dimensional beings that can't
simply be defined by any one thing no matter how good or bad. I guess
even Gandhi must have wanted to punch somebody in the dick at least
once in a while.
Despite
what sounds like a pretty straight set-up, a mother seeks justice for
her brutally murdered child, The Three Billboards Outside
Ebbing, Missouri presents every scenario
with shades of grey. Beyond a photograph of a man's face at the exact
second that he accidentally sits on his own ball-sack you'll never
see a more perfect depiction of pain than McDormand's performance.
From the trailer of the film you can see the hilarity of a foul
mouthed woman that doesn't give a shit about who she offends. Except
if that's what you want then you're going to just have to go on a dog
walk with my Mum instead because that's really not what you get here.
One of the main themes of the movie is in how destructive feelings
will really only lead to further destruction and so as McDormand
takes on more and more people with her zero tolerance attitude it's
hard to conclude that she's always in the right... even if you can
completely understand why she's doing whatever she's doing. I guess
to give an example of what I mean without spoiling the film, imagine
you were mowing your lawn because you needed it to look nice but in
the process you accidentally mowed over a frog and splat it. Except in
this case there's quite a lot of frogs and you're aware that you're
going to go over them but nothing means more to you than getting your
lawn tidy. Also, one of those frogs is quite kind and has cancer. I'm
not sure if that example has helped explain what I mean to be honest
but if that's what McDormand's character did here then I suspect the
French would have something harsher to call it than simply The
Billboards Of Wrath.
On
top of McDormand's character refusing to fit the box of being the
film's hero, or grieving mother, or whatever other label you want to
give her, there's also the racist policeman played by Sam Rockwell. On
the surface you'd imagine his fascist idiot to be the villain of the
film, not least of all because he seems to be standing in McDormand's
way in her search for justice. And yet as the film progresses we
start to sympathise with him and worry for him. This is despite the
fact that his atrocities are never really shied away from. At no
point is anything awful that he's done excused, or justified, or
forgotten it's just that he's depicted as being a human rather than a
cliché. A human that's done terrible things of course, but at the
same time he's one that isn't solely defined by any one individual
action. This is helped too by the fact that we view him through the
eyes of those around him, not least of all Woody Harrelson's Police
Chief. Harrelson's character is the focus of the grieving mothers
campaign and as such you might imagine him to be the tooth-pick
chewing, bad-ass, Dirty Harry-esque cop that he's clearly set-up to
be. Except even he confounds expectations by going on to be the heart
of the film. When seeing Rockwell's fucked up bully through
Harrelson's eyes, we see that he's really just a scared, angry, child.
And so like Louis CK's grim wanker that sexually assaults women one
minute and then seems to be contradictorily feminist the next,
Rockwell's policeman gains our sympathy by simply being an example of
how complicated and confused we are as a species. His behaviour isn't excused.. it just that people are more than the one thing that's currently defining them.
No comments :
Post a Comment