Join us on Facebook! |
Unsurprisingly,
Dunkirk tells the story of Dunkirk where hundreds of
thousands of British soldiers were trapped on the beach and
completely surrounded by Germans. Obviously, this was during
World War 2 although I'm sure much more violent battles have since
been fought there as each side attempts to get their beach towel down
before the other. Being from such a visionary director, it's worth
noting that the story is told from the three different perspectives
of air, sea, and land... the crappy tribute band to 'Boogie
Wonderland's' Earth, Wind, And Fire. Tom Hardy plays an RAF pilot
heading over from Britain, Mark Rylance is one of the many civilian
boat owners that sailed over to rescue the stranded soldiers, and the
soldiers are mostly played by young unknown actors. One of them is
apparently the super famous Harry Styles of whom I have very little
knowledge beyond the fact that the One Direction I associate him with
is the one moving in the opposite direction to my own CD collection.
He seems like a pretty good actor though so anybody worried about him
being here needs to remember that Nolan is a director with an amazing
reputation and not the reincarnated flesh-husk of a horny teenaged
girl.
Being
a Nolan film, it may also come as no surprise to find out that these
three segments play with time in the same way as most of his previous
work. Like the various layers of dreams in his Inception, the
three different segments play out over three separate durations
ranging from a week to a day and an hour, and yet we experience them
all happening simultaneously. Except unlike in Inception, this
is about people being stuck in France and so is actually less like a
dream and more like a fucking nightmare. Unusually for Nolan however,
the running time of Dunkirk is less than two hours long which
is at least a couple of days shorter than most of his other movies.
This is because, despite the setting, the film is less of a war film
and more of a thriller. By having the events compacted and the
duration relatively short, the entire film essentially plays out like
one giant set-piece that couldn't be tighter or tenser if it was a
choir boy being told that he has to “stay behind to kiss the
Bishop on the ring”.
If
Dunkirk were to be considered a war film however then I'd have
to say that it must be one of the most cliché-free war films of all
time. There's no soldier writing to his girlfriend, the overly strict
officer doesn't become a soppy prick during a key moment, and the
soundtrack doesn't feature either The Doors or Vera fucking Lynn. In
fact, there's not even a main character in this movie and the Nazis
are only seen very briefly and without close-up. Nor is there any
real sense of nationalism in the way that most American war films
will end with a shot of their flag waving in the wind, a veteran
saluting it, and then an eagle flying past with a solitary tear
running down its beak. This is lucky because being English and
cynical, the only bit of nationalism and flag-waving that I can get on
board with is in taking the piss out of the French, and even then I'm
not sure why we pretend to hate them. Probably because the worst
they'll do in retaliation is surrender.
That's
not to say however that the film doesn't highlight the work done by
the British during The War, it's just that it does it in the most
British way possible. Being from England, the second World War is
something that still looms large in our culture with grandparents and
great grandparents having experienced it first hand. It's always,
therefore, seemed a bit odd to me that pretty much every major World
War 2 film features a predominately American cast and so perhaps
that's something else that this movie does to avoid cliché. In the
words of Christopher Nolan, he's telling “a very English story but
with an American budget”. Here there are no moments of glory but
simply the 'stiff upper lip' stoicism of people doing their job. When
Tom Hardy is flying his spitfire towards the enemy fighter, it
honestly wouldn't have looked out of place if he'd had a pot of tea
behind him with the fight mostly being a way of him killing time as
he let it brew.
The
other intention of the film seems to be to give one of the most
immersive cinematic experiences of all time. Want to know what it's
like to be in a spitfire as it crashes into the sea? Well, you'll
certainly find out as the camera seems to be sitting in the cockpit
as the plane goes down. My great-grandfather was killed when his ship
was torpedoed during the Second World War and throughout my entire
life, that's been the extent of my comprehension of the incident.
However here you're part of the explosion, you're in the room below
deck when the lights go out, and the screams of panic are quickly
stifled as the water bursts in. Although I'm sure it is still nowhere
near close to experiencing the real thing, it is certainly the closest
I've ever felt to experiencing the reality of these situations. With
his skills of immersion, I can only hope that Nolan's next film is The
Fappening: The Movie.
In
his BBC review of the film, critic Mark Kermode said of Dunkirk,
“This is what blockbuster cinema can look like. If you can make
blockbusters that look like this, why would you not?” I saw
Transformers: The Last Knight a week ago and despite featuring
King Arthur, Nazis, and giant robot dinosaurs, the entire experience
was about as fun as being kicked in the balls. Unlike Michael Bay's
movie in which everything literally stops for characters to attempt
to explain whatever the fuck is going on, Dunkirk is almost a
silent movie. It just so happens to be one of the loudest fucking
silent movies of all time. The narrative is pushed forward with
actions rather than words, with dialogue being almost as sparse as the
use of CGI. When we see a Spitfire hit the sea, we really are seeing a
real Spitfire hitting the sea and not its pixel clone. Even for the
crowd shots on the beach in the distance, rather than CG a fuck-tonne
of soldiers in, Nolan instead used cardboard cut-outs of people. It's
worth noting that these cardboard cut-outs also gave a more dynamic
and three-dimensional performance than anything Michael Bay has ever
managed to come close to in his piece of shit movies.
Many
reviews have been claiming that this is Christopher Nolan's best film
to date, however his films are all of such high quality that asking
“which is the best?” is kind of like asking which real life
politician would you most like to punch in the face? There's not
really a wrong answer. However in terms of how well the story is told
and how original it feels, there really is something special about
Dunkirk. I don't want to spoil too much but my only annoyance
is that you never actually get to find out if the boy from the
opening managed to find a place to take his shit. I hope it's not a
spoiler to say and I won't reveal the boy's actual fate but there's a
perfect moment in which the film concludes with the events being
reported in a newspaper. Just think how poignant it would have been
to have Dunkirk start with him needing a poo, going through
all that he did on the beach, and then finally getting home to a good
English toilet. The symmetry of the story would have been perfect.
You literally could have had that scene but with the boy sat on the
loo reading the paper aloud and then just as he finishes the article
you hear the splash of a dump, cut to the satisfied smile on his
face, hear the flush of the toilet, and then cut to black. Thanks for
reading motherfuckers and see you next time.
No comments :
Post a Comment